🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a protracted court case over whether the former president has the authority and justification to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that local officers have control of the circumstances.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing troops from California.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”