🔗 Share this article

According to a fresh examination, scores of individuals having experience in the petroleum industry have been positioned within the current leadership, including above 40 who formerly been employed straight for gas firms.

Background of the Analysis

The study investigated the histories of candidates and officials positioned in the executive branch and eight federal agencies overseeing environmental matters. These cover important organizations including the environmental agency, the Department of the Interior, and the energy office.

Wider Administrative Environment

This review comes while ongoing efforts to roll back environmental rules and alternative energy programs. For instance, latest acts have opened large areas of public land for mining and reduced backing for sustainable sources.

With the firehose of bad developments that have transpired on the environment side... it’s crucial to inform the public that these aren’t just steps from the vague, huge thing that is the leadership broadly, commented a analyst engaged in the study. It is frequently individual individuals with ties to certain wealthy interests that are executing this harmful pro-industry agenda.

Key Findings

Analysts discovered 111 personnel whom they classified as industry insiders and alternative energy adversaries. That includes 43 individuals who were personally employed by coal enterprises. Among them are well-known leading leaders including the top energy official, who earlier worked as top executive of a hydraulic fracturing firm.

This group also includes lesser-known government members. For example, the office responsible for energy efficiency is managed by a ex- fracking executive. Likewise, a senior policy counsel in the White House has held high-ranking positions at prominent oil companies.

Additional Links

A further 12 officials were found to have connections to fossil fuel-funded libertarian research groups. Those encompass former members and associates of organizations that have strongly opposed alternative sources and championed the use of conventional sources.

A total of 29 other officials are ex- industry leaders from polluting sectors whose business interests are directly linked to energy resources. Other officials have connections with energy providers that sell fossil fuels or government representatives who have supported pro-gas agendas.

Agency Emphasis

Researchers discovered that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior by themselves have links to extractive industries, establishing it as the most influenced national body. This encompasses the secretary of the agency, who has consistently taken oil support and acted as a link between fossil fuel industry supporters and the government.

Political Contributions

Fossil fuel donors donated sizable resources to the presidential operation and ceremony. Since entering the White House, the government has not only established pro-fossil fuel policies but also crafted incentives and tariff carveouts that advantage the field.

Expertise Questions

In addition to oil-tied candidates, the authors found a number of White House leaders who were nominated to powerful jobs with minimal or no pertinent experience.

These individuals may not be connected to fossil fuels so explicitly, but their inexperience is dangerous, stated a co-author. It is logical to think they will be compliant, or susceptible individuals, for the fossil fuel plans.

As an example, the candidate to lead the EPA’s division of chief legal officer has minimal litigation history, having not ever argued a legal matter to completion, nor participated in a sworn statement, and nor argued a motion.

In an additional instance, a White House advisor focusing on regulatory issues moved to the job after serving in positions separate to energy, with no obvious relevant field or regulatory background.

White House Response

A representative for the White House rejected the report, stating that the government’s personnel are highly qualified to execute on the public’s instruction to increase domestic energy output.

Previous and Present Context

The administration enacted a significant number of deregulatory measures during its first tenure. During its present period, equipped with pro-business plans, it has initiated a much wider and harsher rollback on climate regulations and renewable energy.

There’s no shame, commented one researcher. Officials are willing and ready to go out there and tout the fact that they are executing assistance for the fossil fuel sector, resource sector, the energy sector.