🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 stands as among the most deadly – and significant – occasions throughout multiple decades of violence in the region.

Within the community of the incident – the legacy of the tragic events are painted on the structures and embedded in collective memory.

A public gathering was organized on a cold but bright day in Derry.

The demonstration was opposing the policy of detention without trial – detaining individuals without trial – which had been implemented after three years of violence.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment shot dead 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and continues to be, a predominantly Irish nationalist population.

One image became notably iconic.

Pictures showed a clergyman, Father Daly, waving a bloodied fabric as he tried to shield a assembly moving a teenager, the injured teenager, who had been mortally injured.

Journalists captured extensive video on the day.

Documented accounts features Father Daly informing a media representative that soldiers "gave the impression they would shoot indiscriminately" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

The narrative of the incident was rejected by the original examination.

The Widgery Tribunal concluded the military had been shot at first.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the administration set up another inquiry, in response to advocacy by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the conclusion by the investigation said that generally, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the individuals had been armed.

At that time Prime Minister, the leader, apologised in the government chamber – saying fatalities were "unjustified and unjustifiable."

The police commenced look into the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as the accused, was brought to trial for killing.

He was charged regarding the killings of one victim, in his twenties, and in his mid-twenties William McKinney.

Soldier F was further implicated of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, other civilians, further individuals, an additional individual, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a legal order protecting the soldier's privacy, which his legal team have claimed is necessary because he is at risk of attack.

He told the examination that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at individuals who were armed.

The statement was rejected in the concluding document.

Evidence from the examination would not be used immediately as proof in the legal proceedings.

During the trial, the defendant was shielded from sight with a blue curtain.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in the hearing at a hearing in that month, to reply "not guilty" when the allegations were presented.

Family members of the deceased on that day journeyed from the city to the judicial building daily of the proceedings.

One relative, whose relative was died, said they understood that attending the case would be painful.

"I visualize the events in my mind's eye," he said, as we examined the primary sites discussed in the trial – from the street, where Michael was killed, to the nearby the area, where one victim and another victim were died.

"It reminds me to my position that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and place him in the ambulance.

"I experienced again every moment during the proceedings.

"But even with experiencing the process – it's still valuable for me."